Home/Accessibility
Accessibility
What we are aiming for, where we currently fall short, and how to tell us.
Our target
We aim to meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA across this site. We treat accessibility as a requirement, not an enhancement: an automated axe-core check runs on every build and a build that introduces a critical failure does not ship.
What we have done
- Descriptive alternative text on every meaningful image; decorative artwork is hidden from assistive technology.
- Full keyboard operation, including the navigation menus, the giving widget, tabs, accordions, and the image viewer.
- Visible focus indicators that meet the 2.2 focus appearance criteria.
- Text contrast of at least 4.5:1 for body copy and 3:1 for large text and interface components.
- Form fields with programmatic labels and error messages tied to the field they describe.
- A skip link, correct heading order, and landmark regions on every page.
- Motion reduced automatically when your system requests it.
- No CAPTCHA that requires solving a puzzle, doing arithmetic, or identifying images.
- Video is never auto-loaded; captions and transcripts accompany every film.
Where we know we fall short
- Two archived newsletter PDFs are not yet tagged for screen readers. Ask us and we will send an accessible version within two business days.
- Captions on three older films are auto-generated and have not been reviewed by a human.
Tell us
If something on this site blocks you, email [email protected]. We acknowledge within one business day and aim to fix or provide an alternative within ten. Tell us the page and what happened; you do not need to know the technical term for it.
This statement was last reviewed in September 2026. Our accessibility conformance report (VPAT) is available on request.